Zillow Group responds to lawsuit filed by Real Estate Exchange, denies antitrust claims


(Bigstock Photo)

The news: Seattle-based Zillow Group responded to an antitrust lawsuit filed by Austin-based real estate startup Real Estate Exchange in March that accused Zillow of anticompetitive behavior related to how certain homes are shown on its platform. In an opposition motion, Zillow alleges that REXs claims are self-serving and that its motion fails at every level and should be denied.

Background: Founded in 2015, REX aims to disrupt the traditional brokerage model by charging sellers lower commissions. It uses sites such as Zillow to market homes, and recently launched in the Seattle area.

In its lawsuit, REX alleges that Zillow conceals REX agent listings following a recent change to Zillows search portal. As part of its move to buy and sell homes directly via Zillow Offers, Zillow joined The National Association of Realtors (NAR) which is also listed as a defendant in the suit, along with Zillow subsidiary Trulia and began sourcing homes from multiple listing services (MLS) databases.

Due to MLS rules, listings on Zillow are now grouped under two tabs: agent listings, and other listings, which lists homes not included in MLS databases. REX describes it as a recessed, obscured, and deceptive tab that consumers do not see.

REX says the change has hurt its traffic and impacted its reputation.

If the NAR and its MLS partners, which now include Zillow, are allowed to once again close off transparent access to home inventory by entering into agreements among themselves that disadvantage all but their own membership, consumers and competition will suffer, REXs lawsuit reads.

ZIllows response:Zillow says the move to a two-tab display for its online platforms was made to comply with MLS rules and to obtain high-quality listings, not to harm REX. It denies antitrust allegations, calling REX a vertical supplier in the property listings data aggregation business. The company also says REX cannot prove a violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act, and says REXs delay in filing its lawsuit seriously undercuts REXs claim of irreparable harm.

The facts and motivation behind this lawsuit are simple: REX is unhappy with Zillows independent decision to obtain faster, more reliable, and better data for Zillows consumer, Zillow says in its filing.

Zillow asks that the court deny REXs request for a preliminary injunction.

Zillows official statement: Per our filing, we believe REXs claims are without merit. As MLS participants, we are required to abide by the MLS rules and regulations. We are always advocating for rules that benefit consumers, the entire industry and drive innovation for all. Zillow spokesperson

Weve reached out to REX for comment and will update this story if we hear back.

Heres Zillows full opposition filing:





Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *