Apple AirTags UX teardown: The trade-off between privacy and user experience – TechCrunch


Apples location devices called AirTags have been out for more than a month now. The initial impressions were good, but as we concluded back in April: It will be interesting to see these play out once AirTags are out getting lost in the wild.

Thats exactly what our resident UX analyst, Peter Ramsey, has been doing for the last month intentionally losing AirTags to test their user experience at the limits.

This Extra Crunch exclusive is a simplified conversation around this Built for Mars article, which helps bridge the gap between Apples mistakes and how you can make meaningful changes to your products UX.

For an industry thats often soured by privacy concerns, Apple has an unusually strong stance on keeping your data private.

AirTag not reachable

There are two primary purposes of an error message:

  1. To notify the user what has gone wrong (and how it affects them).
  2. To help the user resolve the issue.

Most businesses do a decent job at the first one, but its rare that a product will proactively obsess over the second.

Typically, Apple is one of the few examples that do its indisputably one of the leaders in intuitive design. Which is why I was surprised to see Apples error message when an AirTag is not reachable:

Image Credits: Built for Mars screenshot

Theres a huge amount of ambiguity in the statement move around to connect, and it fails to mention that this error could be because the AirTags batteries have been removed.

Instead, Apple should make this message clickable, which opens a modal to learn more about this issue.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *